Tenth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 457
Cook v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dustin Cook
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
LePlatt v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
James LePlatt and James H. LePlatt
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Beasley v. Kendall
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Teresa Beasley
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Casares v. USA
as 1:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
Dale Gensler Casares and Dale G. Casares
Defendant:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
Miner v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2022cv00254
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Mary Miner
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Miller v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Kristopher R. Miller
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Watson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
James Keith Watson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Nanney v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2021cv02882
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Nanney
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Mahurin v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2021cv00431
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Mahurin
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Goen v. Wilkie et al
as 4:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jeri Goen
Defendant:
Robert L Wilkie, Jr, Dennis Richard McDonough, Dr John Chelf and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
