Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 49,338
United States v. Rogers
as 24-3057
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND L. ROGERS
Mead v. Harding
as 24-7031
Petitioner: WILLIAM CLAUDE MEAD
Respondent: RANDY HARDING, Warden
Franklin v. Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: Jason Javon Franklin
Defendant: Chris Bryant, Carter County Detention Center, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mascarenos v. Rio Arriba County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: Daniel Mascarenos
Defendant: Rio Arriba County Jail, James LNU and FNU Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova (PS) v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01008
Petitioner: Louis M. Cordova
Respondent: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner: Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent: Ryan Florres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gottorff (PS) v. People of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2024cv01009
Plaintiff: David J. Gottorff
Defendant: People of Colorado, The, Phil Weiser, State of Colorado, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections Office of Legal Services et al
as 1:2024cv00988
Plaintiff: Robert Wayne Robinson
Defendant: Colorado Department of Corrections Office of Legal Services, Adrienne Sanchez, Celia Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner: Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent: Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeJesus v. Grady County Law Enforcement Center
as 5:2024cv00373
Plaintiff: Alexis DeJesus
Defendant: Grady County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?