Eastern District of Oklahoma Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,481
Carroll v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00335
Plaintiff: Ryan M. Carroll
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dill v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00332
Plaintiff: Craig Dill
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Adams v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00333
Plaintiff: Verna D. Adams
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shivers v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00328
Plaintiff: Mandy Shivers
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ashbrook v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00324
Plaintiff: Patricia M. Ashbrook
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santos v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00321
Plaintiff: Amie Adams Santos
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blankenship v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00319
Plaintiff: Lindsey G. Blankenship
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cheri v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00303
Plaintiff: Paul Cheri
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: Mark Alfred Davis
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Worthean v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00297
Plaintiff: Jeff W. Worthean
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?