Eleventh Circuit Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 754
ACW INC v. ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: A.C.W. Inc. and ACW INC
Defendant: Ashford Leebcor Enterprises, LLC, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 0:2023cv61247
Plaintiff: IEng, LLC and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Korte Construction Company d/b/a The Korte Company and Korte Construction Company doing business as The Korte Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
IEng, LLC v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 0:2023cv61245
Plaintiff: IEng, LLC
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Korte Construction Company d/b/a The Korte Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
BOOTH PLUMBING CO INC. v. ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 4:2023cv00121
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use of Booth Plumbing Co., Inc. and BOOTH PLUMBING CO INC
Defendant: Ashford Leebcor Enterprises, LLC, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States Of America et al v. F.D. Thomas, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff: United States Of America and Champion Painting Specialty Services Corporation
Defendant: F.D. Thomas, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty And Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
SOUTHERN SPEAR IRONWORKS LLC v. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv09292
Plaintiff: SOUTHERN SPEAR IRONWORKS LLC
Defendant: HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and TRAVELERS CASAULTY AND SURETY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of EWS Texas, Inc. v. The Robins and Morton Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00288
Counter Defendant: United States of America for the use and benefit of EWS Texas, Inc.
Defendant: Robins and Morton Corporation doing business as Robins and Morton Group, Zurich American Insurance Company and The Robins and Morton Corporation doing business as Robins and Morton Group
Counter Claimant: The Robins and Morton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Florida Keys Electric, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 4:2023cv10025
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Florida Keys Electric, Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES f/u/b/o MILITARY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION d/b/a MIL-CON ELECTRIC COMPANY and United States a Florida Corporation for the use and benefit of Military Construction Corporation doing business as Mil-Con Electric Company
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit of Randall Mechanical, Inc., United States for the use and benefit of Randall Electrical Contractors, Inc., United States of America and others
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?