Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 56,130
Payne v. Secretary Department Of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00911
Petitioner:
Henry Payne
Respondent:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Secretary Department Of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Jesse Owens
Respondent:
Secretary Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hill
Respondent:
Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Quint Lavert Evans
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ricardo Tull v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11172
Petitioner:
RICARDO TULL
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Ruiz, Jorge v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv60579
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ruiz
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guy v. Burch
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Vernon Guy
Respondent:
Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Briggs v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Janiecia Denise Briggs
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
