US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 11,105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Mera v. Annett Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael S Mera
Defendant:
Annett Holdings, Inc., Silver-line Plastics Corp, TracFone Wireless, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Fairfield City Board of Education
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Yolanda S Wright
Defendant:
Fairfield City Board of Education, Fairfield Board of Education and Fairfield City School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Burt v. Garmany et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Naquita Burt
Defendant:
Sean Garmany, Adam Culbert, Phil Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tapia v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Julie Dawn Tapia
Defendant:
T Muhammad, Chridren's Hospital of Alabama and Children's Hospital of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
