Alabama Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,650
Kaczmarczyk v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. Kaczmarczyk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1382 Eligibility for Benefits
Scales v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Shane Scales
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Adam Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bass v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christine Bass
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Collins v. Commissioner Of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Myron Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Amanda Adams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reed v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Reed
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Varnon v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Barry L Varnon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. O'Malley (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Chambers v. O'Malley (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Patrick Chambers
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
