Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 22,807
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. Osborn
as 7:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Bobby Presley
Defendant:
Stefan Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weingrad v. Keyes (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ari P. Weingrad
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Timothy Price
Defendant:
Hudson, P Homes, Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Isiah Davis
Defendant:
Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yauger, Jr. v. Greene County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Benny Earl Yauger, Jr.
Defendant:
Greene County Jail, Greene County Sheriffs Office, Sheriff Jonathan Benison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcneal v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mcneal
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Mobile Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Derrick Florence
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department, Officer Payne, Officer Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
