US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Contract Cases

Negotiable Instrument Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 138
CENTENNIAL BANK v. SEDONA II LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00346
Plaintiff: CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant: SEDONA II LLC , STEVEN E ALLEN and COMMONWEALTH PARTNERS II LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOKOL v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2014cv00310
Plaintiff: JOHN SOKOL
Defendant: STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITNEY BANK v. CDS INVESTMENTS PROPERTIES LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00185
Plaintiff: WHITNEY BANK
Defendant: CDS INVESTMENTS PROPERTIES LLC and DOYLE MULLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTENNIAL BANK v. BALDWIN PARK TALLAHASSEE LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00132
Defendant: BALDWIN PARK TALLAHASSEE LLC, STEVEN M LEONI and PETER ROSEN
Plaintiff: CENTENNIAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTENNIAL BANK v. LEONI et al
as 4:2014cv00131
Plaintiff: CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant: STEVEN M LEONI, PORTOFINO VILLAS LLC and JAMES S SAULS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
CENTENNIAL BANK v. Ulofts Lubbock LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00095
Plaintiff: CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant: Ulofts Lubbock LLC , STEVEN M LEONI , PETER ROSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTENNIAL BANK v. LEONI PROPERTIES INC et al
as 4:2014cv00094
Plaintiff: CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant: LEONI PROPERTIES INC and STEVEN M LEONI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITNEY BANK v. NIVENS
as 3:2014cv00082
Plaintiff: WHITNEY BANK
Defendant: RICHARD V NIVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTENNIAL BANK v. RUDNICK
as 4:2013cv00673
Plaintiff: CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant: James M Rudnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CENTENNIAL BANK v. MCBROOM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00653
Plaintiff: CENTENNIAL BANK
Defendant: JOHN W MCBROOM and KAREN K MCBROOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?