US District Court for the Southern District of Florida Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Advanced Diabetes Treatment Centers, LLC v. Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 0:2011cv62508
Plaintiff:
Advanced Diabetes Treatment Centers, LLC
Defendant:
Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Advanced Diabetes Treatment Centers, LLLC v. Kathleen Sebelius in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2011cv24237
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Advanced Diabetes Treatment Centers, LLC v. Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2011cv24239
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Las Mercedes Home Care Corp. v. Sebelius
as 1:2010cv23916
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Las Mercedes Home Care Corp. v. Sebelius
as 1:2010cv23919
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Lazo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv20614
Plaintiff:
Juan Tomas Lazo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Miami, S Region
as 1:2010cv20375
Plaintiff:
Wallace C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Miami, S Region
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walsh v. Brophy
as 1:1969mc06969
Defendant:
Katie Brophy
Plaintiff:
Kate Walsh and Kate Walsh
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Gonzalez v. Commissoner of SS
as 9:2006cv80403
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
Waller v. Barnhart
as 9:2005cv81112
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
