Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 16,205
HODO v. WEINDEL
as 5:2025cv00090
Plaintiff:
JARVIS VONTREZ HODO
Defendant:
C M WEINDEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISE v. BRANON
as 5:2025cv00091
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B WISE
Defendant:
BRANON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lineberry et al v. City of St. Augustine, Florida et al
as 3:2025cv00347
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., City of St. Augustine, Florida, St. Johns County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jed Lineberry and Twila Smedley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DiMaio v. Jacksonville Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2025cv00379
Plaintiff:
Dominic Alan DiMaio
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriffs Office and Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. Florida Department of Correction
as 2:2025cv00317
Plaintiff:
Yoandris R. Fuentes
Defendant:
Florida Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee, James v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2025cv21726
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Lee
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, South Bay Correctional Facility, M. Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTON v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2025cv00487
Plaintiff:
DAVID COTTON, JR
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. HAYES et al
as 3:2025cv00489
Plaintiff:
RANDY WHITE
Defendant:
Z HAYES, M BURDETT and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Dixon et al
as 3:2025cv00378
Plaintiff:
Martinez Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon and Officer W. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juymohan v. Sandall et al
as 3:2025cv00386
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Juymohan
Defendant:
Lieutenant A. Sandall and Officer J. Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
