US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,096
LOWE v. GARMON
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOWE
Defendant:
MS GARMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISHON v. JACKSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
SETH AXLEY WISHON
Defendant:
JACKSON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN NESS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
KEVIS VAN NESS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and Captain GLENDA HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WEST et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Defendant:
Lieutenant ADRIAN WEST, Warden LETITIA BURKS, ANTHONY ANTONIO HAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Defendant:
BEN HILL COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIRLS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL NURSES STAFF
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
JAMES SIRLS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL NURSES STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNOR v. MITCHELL
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
TONY L CONNOR, MOSES ROBERSON, KELVIN KING and others
Defendant:
Commander LARRY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
