US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 121 - 130 of 26,236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
STATEWIDE AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS INC v. SOUTHERN EQUIPMENT SALES & SERVICE INC
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Statewide Automotive Equipment Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
SOUTHERN EQUIPMENT SALES & SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JOHNSON v. A 7 TRANSPORT LOGISTICS LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
QUINTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
A 7 TRANSPORT LOGISTICS LLC, A 7 TRANSPORT EXPRESS LLC, A 7 TRANSPORT EXPEDITED LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SCOTT v. MCFARLAND
as 7:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
DARRELL BERNARD SCOTT, JR
Respondent:
ANDREW MCFARLAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCLEOD v. CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF LOWNDES COUNTY
as 7:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
VICKI MCLEOD
Defendant:
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF LOWNDES COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DEESE v. POWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
KADY DEESE
Defendant:
Deputy RYAN POWELL and Corporal ANDREW GUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HAGGINS v. USA
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
GARRY HAGGINS, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MONTGOMERY v. TILE VENTURES INC
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
SABRINA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
TLE VENTURES INC
FIFFIA v. WALMART INC
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE FIFFIA
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
