Middle District of Georgia Cases

Cases filed


Cases 41 - 50 of 16,562
GHOLSTON v. CANNON et al
as 5:2016cv00518
Plaintiff: DEANTE GHOLSTON
Defendant: MICHAEL CANNON, WILLIAM POWELL
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
COBBLE v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00214
Petitioner: DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STATE GOVERNMENT, BRITISH GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SOILBERRY v. USA
as 1:2016cv00215
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: TREVISCO SOILBERRY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DEBOURGH MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GSC CONSTRUCTION INC, et al.
as 4:2016cv00370
Plaintiff: Debourgh Manufacturing Company
Defendant: GSC CONSTRUCTION, INC., ALLIED WORLD SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00515
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION v. Banister Brothers Farm et al
as 7:2016cv00222
Plaintiff: AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION
Defendant: Banister Brothers Farm, keith I banister
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION V BANISTER BROS FARM, et al
as 7:2016cv00223
Plaintiff: AUTAUGA QUALITY COTTON ASSOCIATION
Defendant: BANISTER BROS FARM, KEITH I BANISTER
Cause Of Action: Breach of Contract
GREEN v. PRINE
as 7:2016cv00219
Petitioner: AARON L GREEN, JR
Respondent: CHRIS PRINE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WOOLF et al v. IC System, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00514
Plaintiff: CHRIS WOOLF , CAMILLE L WOOLF
Defendant: IC System, Inc., DOES
Cause Of Action: Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radio Telegraphs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?