US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,440
Rice et al v. Tinsley et al
as 1:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Darius Rice and Ashley Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Stephen Tinsley and April Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2024cv01461
Plaintiff:
Vakelvion Holmes
Defendant:
Clayton County and Officer Justin Stephens
Walker v. Google Company et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Mr. Willie Cal Walker
Defendant:
Google Company, infro@referleadersettlement.com, Horizon Acturial Settlement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Turner v. Fox More Staffing et al
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Fox More Staffing, Michael James, Michael Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Messer Franchises LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Messer Franchises LLC, Lynn Messer Hawkins and Paul Messer
Dukes v. Delta Community Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Robert-Charles Dukes
Defendant:
Delta Community Credit Union, Bob Manning, Hank Halter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilstrap v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
as 1:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. McConathy
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Scott Ward
Defendant:
Misty McConathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Kirby et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Love
Defendant:
Dane Kirby, Sgt. Kacy Godsey, Sgt. Katie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wheeler Walker v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lavon Wheeler Walker
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Wade Damron and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
