US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 19,046
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Byron T Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Sword and McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. Babb et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Todd Andrew
Defendant:
Sheriff Barry H. Babb and Fayette County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
Robert Pierce
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Fulton County Sheriffs Office and Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Byron T Arnold
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Sword and McGhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
William Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Angelo Bernard Banks
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillps v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01245
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Phillps
Defendant:
John Doe, Lieutenant Swats, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. USA
as 1:2024cv01234
Plaintiff:
Quinton Oliver
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
