US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Su v. Avenger Products LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Avenger Products LLC and Kittrich Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Cinamaker, Inc. v. Baker
as 1:2023cv05542
Plaintiff:
Cinamaker, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Best v. EmployBridge, Corporation
as 1:2023cv04988
Plaintiff:
Timothy Best
Defendant:
ResourceMFG, Tonya Simms, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Su v. Local 1700, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO
as 1:2023cv04029
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Local 1700, Amalgamated Transit Union, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stephens v. Homewood Suites
as 1:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Stephens
Defendant:
Homewood Suites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Glenn v. DFCS- Carroll County
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Constance Glenn
Defendant:
DFCS- Carroll County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gresham v. Kia Georgia, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Quovadas Gresham
Defendant:
Kia Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Walsh v. AETC Inc.
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
AETC Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
DAVIS-HARRIS et al. v. OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
KHALIF DAVIS-HARRIS and AARON TUTT
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Weaver v. Osmose Utilities Service, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gregory Weaver
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
