US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 21,592
Black v. TA Operating LLC
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Linda Black
Defendant:
TA Operating LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Evans v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Quint Lavert Evans
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sifuenter v. State of Georgia
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berkley Assurance Company v. SEA Truck Service, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Berkley Assurance Company
Defendant:
SEA Truck Service, LLC and Eric Pinault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bragg v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Jacob Bragg
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
The United States of America v. Woodlands at Montgomery LP et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Woodlands at Montgomery LP, Woodlands at Montgomery GP LLC, Kittle Property Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
