Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,448
Walker v. USA
as 1:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
ELBERT WALKER, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moon-Cook v. USA
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Britney Moon-Cook
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wheatley v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Jayson Dwayne Wheatley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wheeler v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00417
Petitioner:
Marion Wheeler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diggs v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Maurice Antwain Diggs
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Coleman v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Ra'Ann Michelle Coleman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Holland v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Derrico D. Holland
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Turrentine v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Antonio Turrentine
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ali v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Abdul Jamal Ali
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dixon v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Ricky Dixon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
