D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 8,341
DALCOLLO v. FLORES et al
as 1:2023cv03713
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO
Defendant:
RAMERO FLORES, MARY FLORES and ANTHONY WILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquis Heard v. Scott Harris
as 23-5272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marquis Deron Heard
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Harris, Official Capacity
PORTO CARRERO v. OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2023cv03551
Plaintiff:
WALBERTO SANCHEZ PORTO CARRERO
Defendant:
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEM v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv03541
Plaintiff:
SAAED MOSLEM
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, U.S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
TAITE-EL-BEY-TEY v. ALABAMA PRESIDENT PRO TEMPURE SENATE et al
as 1:2023cv03542
Plaintiff:
MARCUS O TAITE-EL-BEY-TEY-WASHINGTON TURNER and MARCUS O. TAITE-EL-BEY-TEY-WASHITOW TURNER
Defendant:
ALABAMA PRESIDENT PRO TEMPURE SENATE, ALABAMA SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICES, KAY IVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cochise Shakur v. Warden
as 23-5258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cochise Amari Shakur
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden, FCI Petersburg
LEHIERI v. FEDERAL MARSHALS
as 1:2023cv03438
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LEHIERI
Defendant:
FEDERAL MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5253
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Nelson v. Florida Department of Correction, et al
as 23-7148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Nelson
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Department of Correction and State of Florida
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
