D.C. Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
KELLY v. RICHARD WRIGHT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL et al
as 1:2016cv01853
Plaintiff:
TORRAIN KELLY
Defendant:
RICHARD WRIGHT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL and MARCO CLARK
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
LONG v. ENDOCRINE SOCIETY
as 1:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
LETICIA E. LONG
Defendant:
ENDOCRINE SOCIETY
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2015cv01552
Plaintiff:
ERIK T. HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS and ROBERT A. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
Tamika Edmonds v. Engility Corporation
as 15-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tamika Edmonds
Defendant - Appellee:
Engility Corporation
SHATTEEN v. OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv01962
Defendant:
OMNI HOTELS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
TAMIKO SHATTEEN
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
PEMBERTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01623
Plaintiff:
REUBEN PEMBERTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and NICHOLAS MAJETT
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
ONYEWU v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF THE MID-ATLANTIC STATES, INC.
as 1:2014cv01182
Defendant:
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF THE MID-ATLANTIC STATES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHIKEZ ONYEWU
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
PERRIN v. COURTESY ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PERRIN
Defendant:
COURTESY ASSOCIATES, LLC and SMITHBUCKLIN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
YOUNG v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
TANYA R. YOUNG
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
THOMAS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2013cv01551
Plaintiff:
JAMIE M. THOMAS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
