District of District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed


Cases 11 - 20 of 6,640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02550
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02554
Plaintiff: ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY , PAUL J. WIEDEFELD
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON v. DUKE
as 1:2017cv02544
Defendant: ELAINE C. DUKE
Plaintiff: JOHN G. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02535
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02533
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02532
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02519
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02491
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
APOLLO, SR. v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA et al
as 1:2017cv02492
Plaintiff: JOSE G. APOLLO, SR.
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, NA , BARRY P. JAMES , NANCY MEJIA and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?