District of District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 5,136
AUREL v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02088
Plaintiff: MICH AUREL
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS et al
as 1:2016cv02055
Plaintiff: SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant: UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FEDERAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION, DANE R. GILLETTE and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2016cv02058
Petitioner: SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent: U.S. GOVERNMENT, KAMALA D. HARRIS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. USA
as 1:2016cv02048
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: MICHAEL MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LINDER v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
as 1:2016cv02039
Plaintiff: DAVID W. LINDER
Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
LEONARD v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2016cv02047
Plaintiff: STEPHEN DANIEL LEONARD
Defendant: GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
SMITH v. FOXWELL
as 1:2016cv02042
Petitioner: CHARLES SMITH
Respondent: RICKY FOXWELL
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv02026
Plaintiff: DERRICK LAVELL WILLIAMS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
MAURICE v. FOXWELL
as 1:2016cv02043
Petitioner: LAMONT MAURICE
Respondent: RICKY FOXWELL
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ATAH EL v. CHIPPENDALE
as 1:2016cv02041
Petitioner: SAKITAH SELMAH ATAH EL
Respondent: MARGARET CHIPPENDALE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?