District of District of Columbia Cases

Cases filed


Cases 51 - 60 of 31,451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00252
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2017cv00246
Plaintiff: RISHANDA WILLIAMS
Defendant: CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
BRN CORP. et al v. COCHRAN
as 1:2017cv00247
Plaintiff: BRN CORP. , METRO WEST REHAB. CORP.
Defendant: NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NIXON v. USA
as 1:2017cv00250
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: KEVIN NIXON
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DAVIS v. YOUNG
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff: ROSETTA DAVIS
Defendant: MICHAEL YOUNG
Cause Of Action: Employment Discrimination
v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2017cv00244
Cause Of Action: Employment Discrimination
NEW LIFECARE HOSPITALS OF NORTH CAROLINA LLC et al v. COCHRAN
as 1:2017cv00237
Defendant: NORRIS COCHRAN
Plaintiff: NEW LIFECARE HOSPITALS OF NORTH CAROLINA LLC , NEW LIFECARE HOSPITALS OF CHESTER COUNTY LLC , NEW LIFECARE HOSPITALS OF SOUTH TEXAS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Review of Agency Decision
ROCKY MOUNTAIN HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION, INC. v. COCHRAN
as 1:2017cv00242
Plaintiff: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION, INC.
Defendant: NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. RANON, INC.
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff: BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND , BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND , INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE
Defendant: RANON, INC.
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.
MENGISTE v. 1901-07 15TH STREET, N.W. COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2017cv00240
Plaintiff: MELIKT MENGISTE
Defendant: 1901-07 15TH STREET, N.W. COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, DELIA THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: Fair Housing Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?