District of Columbia Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,471
ADAVENAIZZ v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY
as 1:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
CHANEL ADAVENAIZZ
Defendant:
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
JENKINS v. MASON HARRIMAN GROUP, INC.
as 1:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Duane Jenkins
Defendant:
Mason Harriman Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
WHITING v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
PAULA VICTORIA WHITING
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BAPTIST HEALTHCARE OF OKLAHOMA, LLC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
BAPTIST HEALTHCARE OF OKLAHOMA, LLC doing business as INTEGRIS BASS BAPTIST HEALTH CENTER and INTEGRIS BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
G.T. SOLUTIONS, LLC. v. HIGHWAY AND SAFETY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA F/U/B/O G.T. SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. agent of D/B/A VEGA LIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS
Defendant:
HIGHWAY AND SAFETY SERVICES, INC. and SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ASCENSION BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DUNLAP v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al

as 1:2023cv00461
Plaintiff:
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00458
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.