District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,361
CARMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01100
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH CARMER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARK ADAMCHIK, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MARVIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01117
Petitioner: MARK MARVIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MARVIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv01093
Petitioner: MARK MARVIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
DICKSON v. KING
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff: SIMONE DICKSON
Defendant: RANDY KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKSON v. BISNOTT
as 1:2022cv01054
Plaintiff: SIMONE DICKSON
Defendant: BRITTANY BISNOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff: DARYL SHARP
Defendant: TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE OSCAR VELASCO GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FOWLER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00987
Plaintiff: GLORIANA FOWLER
Defendant: KILOB KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOOR et al v. BERGER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff: SUKHBIR SINGH TOOR, JASKIRAT SINGH, AEKASH SINGH and others
Defendant: DAVID BERGER, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2022cv00996
Plaintiff: DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ALEJANDRO v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
as 1:2022cv01020
Plaintiff: OMAR MEDINA ALEJANDRO
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?