District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,767
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. TOGGAS et al
as 1:2023cv02694
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
THOMAS TOGGAS and KATHRYN ANN TOGGAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATEL v. LIU et al
as 1:2023cv02699
Plaintiff:
KASHYAP PATEL and ROD ROSENSTEIN
Defendant:
JESSIE K. LIU, ROBERT HUR, ED O'CALLAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LAURENT MILLER v. EXPEDIA GROUP et al
as 1:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant:
EXPEDIA GROUP and FONTIER AIRLINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JENKINS v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv02664
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JEAN-BAPTISTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02669
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ALLEN v. HAMMOUDE
as 1:2023cv02666
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
HASSAN HAMMOUDE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
ANDREA JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
GRAYBILL v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2023cv02609
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT GRAYBILL
Defendant:
U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
FLORES v. UPMC HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2023cv02626
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant:
UPMC HOSPITAL and ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JEFFERSON v. LOUIS DEJOY
as 1:2023cv02576
Plaintiff:
NAEICIA JEFFERSON
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.