District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 315
SOLANO-MORETA v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00619
Plaintiff:
JORGE SOLANO-MORETA
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS and THOMAS KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv01781
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and ASHLEY CHRISTENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SMITH v. FORSYTH et al
as 1:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
KATHLEEN A. FORSYTH, DARYL RYAN TAYLOR, FRANK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACIAS-OCHOA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv00908
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM MACIAS-OCHOA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL and OFFICE OF INTERANL AFFAIRS FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BREAZIL v. TRAVERS et al
as 1:2017cv00925
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BREAZIL
Defendant:
JACOB C. TRAVERS, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
JONES v. POLUNSKY DISCIPLINARY & CLASSIFY OFFICIALS et al
as 1:2017cv00887
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
POLUNSKY DISCIPLINARY & CLASSIFY OFFICIALS and TEXAS BOARD PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and A. LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHANDLER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and JACK FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MUSTAFA v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
SAEL MUSTAFA
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III, FERNANDO J. GAITAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
