Federal Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,037
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
AUSLAND BUILDERS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
AUSLAND BUILDERS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
AIRCRAFT AND TURBINE SUPPORT CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
AIRCRAFT AND TURBINE SUPPORT CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Syneren Technologies Corp. v. US
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
SYNEREN TECHNOLOGIES CORP., CAN SOFTTECH, INC., JCS SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, RIVA SOLUTIONS, INC., BRIGHTPOINT, LLC and others
PMCG COLLABORATEUP JV LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
PMCG COLLABORATEUP JV LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
PUNCH CYBER ANALYTICS GROUP, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
PUNCH CYBER ANALYTICS GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
DIGIFLIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ADVANCED SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
ADVANCED SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
BOWHEAD PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
EAGLE HILL CONSULTING, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
EAGLE HILL CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
POTOMACWAVE CONSULTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
AIRCRAFT AND TURBINE SUPPORT CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2023cv02180
Plaintiff:
AIRCRAFT AND TURBINE SUPPORT CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
