U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Labor Cases

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 362
Browe v. CTC Corporation
as 23-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee: Donna Browe, Tyler Burgess, Bonnie Jamieson and others
Plaintiff: Lucille Launderville
Counter Claimant: Bruce Laumeister and CTC Corporation
Browe v. CTC Corporation
as 23-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant: Donna Browe, Tyler Burgess, Bonnie Jamieson and others
Appellant: Lucille Launderville
Counter Claimant: CTC Corporation and Bruce Laumeister
Vellali v. Yale University
as 23-1172
Plaintiff: Ranay P. Cirillo, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and Tara Heard, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan
Plaintiff / Appellee: Joseph Vellali, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Nancy S. Lowers, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Jan M. Taschner, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and others
Defendant / Appellant: Yale University, Michael A. Peel and The Retirement Plan Fiduciary Committee
Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 23-1135
Plaintiff / Appellant: Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee: Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 23-1134
Plaintiff / Appellant: Park Avenue Podiatric Care, P.L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee: Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Johnson v. The Hartford
as 23-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant: Melinda L. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee: The Hartford
Singh v. Deloitte LLP
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rupinder Singh, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Jeffrey S. Popkin, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Joni Walker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deloitte LLP, The Board of Directors of Deloitte LLP, The Retirement Plan Committee of Deloitte LLP and others
Perlman v. General Electric
as 23-1099
Plaintiff / Appellant: Carol Perlman
Defendant / Appellee: General Electric, GE Healthcare, H. Lawrence Culp, Jr. and others
Vellali v. Yale University
as 23-1082
Plaintiff: Ranay P. Cirillo, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and Tara Heard, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Vellali, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Nancy S. Lowers, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Jan M. Taschner, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and others
Defendant / Appellee: Yale University, Michael A. Peel and The Retirement Plan Fiduciary Committee
Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Welfa v. Manny P. Concrete Co., Inc.
as 23-1030
Plaintiff / Appellee: Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Welfare Fund, Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund, Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Annuity Fund and others
Defendant: Manny P. Con Industries, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Manny P. Concrete Co., Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?