Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25,520
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Niagara County Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2024cv06235
Plaintiff:
Christian M. Castro
Defendant:
Niagara County Correctional Facility, Niagara County, Sgt. S. Paonessa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florance v. Broome County et al
as 9:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Thomas Florance
Defendant:
Broome County, Frederick J. Akshar, Robert Charpinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFreitas v. Kubetz et al
as 2:2024cv02918
Plaintiff:
Russell DeFreitas
Defendant:
Jacob Kubetz, Anthony Senft, Christopher Brocato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morinville v. Upstate Correctional Facility RRU et al
as 9:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Carlos Morinville
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility RRU, Doe 1, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Govan v. The State of New York
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kwauhuru Govan
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Vaughn et al
as 9:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
James D. Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Vaughn, Parole Officer Kevin Harmer, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2024cv02865
Defendant:
Jermaine Boykin, County Of Westchester, Lemar Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breton v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Randy Breton, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagan v. U.S. Marshal
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hagan
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
