Connecticut Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Puccino et al v. SNET Info Svc Inc
as 3:2009cv01551
Plaintiff:
Tara Puccino, Tammy Sherwood, Michael Hawes and others
Defendant:
SNET Info Svc Inc and SNET Info Svc Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
District Lodge 26 v. United Tech Corp, Pratt & Whitney
as 3:2009cv01494
Plaintiff:
District Lodge 26
Defendant:
United Tech Corp, Pratt & Whitney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Guitard v. United Assoc of Sprinkler Fitters & Apprentices
as 3:2009cv01038
Plaintiff:
James Guitard
Defendant:
United Assoc of Sprinkler Fitters & Apprentices
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Ritacco v. Whole Life, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00792
Plaintiff:
Beth Ritacco
Defendant:
Whole Life, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Court Security Officers of CT v. Akal Security Inc
as 3:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Court Security Officers of CT
Defendant:
Akal Security Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Aramark Ed Svc, Inc v. Unite/Here!
as 3:2008cv01851
Plaintiff:
Aramark Ed Svc, Inc
Defendant:
Unite/Here!
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fields v. Connecticut Light & Power Co
as 3:2008cv01709
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fields
Defendant:
Connecticut Light & Power Co
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charette v. New England Carpenters Local Union 43
as 3:2008cv01538
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Charette
Defendant:
New England Carpenters Local Union 43
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Association of Court Security Ofcr of CT v. Akal Security Inc
as 3:2008cv01461
Plaintiff:
Association of Court Security Ofcr of CT
Defendant:
Akal Security Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Association of Court Security Ofcr of CT v. Akal Security Inc
as 3:2008cv01462
Plaintiff:
Association of Court Security Ofcr of CT
Defendant:
Akal Security Inc and Akal Security Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
