US District Court for the Eastern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,459
Stallone v. Kopp
as 2:2023cv07865
Petitioner:
Jerome Stallone
Respondent:
Marilyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ottey v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv07828
Petitioner:
Kevin Ottey
Respondent:
NYC Department of Corrections, Louis Molina and People of the State of New York District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. DOCCS
as 1:2023cv07785
Petitioner:
Andre Johnson
Respondent:
DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Kopp
as 1:2023cv07418
Petitioner:
Senate Rivera
Respondent:
Ms. M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gates v. Toulon, Jr.
as 2:2023cv07599
Petitioner:
Branden Gates
Respondent:
Errol D. Toulon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franzese v. Miller
as 1:2023cv07380
Petitioner:
Edward Franzese
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Barometre
as 1:2023cv07331
Petitioner:
Bruce Parker
Respondent:
Superintendent D. Barometre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunaway v. Kopp
as 1:2023cv07404
Petitioner:
Raheem Dunaway
Respondent:
M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanson v. Hochul et al
as 1:2023cv07326
Petitioner:
Pamela Hanson
Respondent:
Ms. Hochul and President
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Kopp
as 2:2023cv05039
Petitioner:
Mr. Saheim A. Douglas
Respondent:
Ms. M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
