Third Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 95,198
LANGEN v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06523
Plaintiff:
JAMES LANGEN
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PIPPEN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv06524
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
LAKISHA PIPPEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv06510
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
HALEY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRADFORD v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv06508
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY BRADFORD
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURGUIA v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv06485
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
OSCAR MURGUIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTORO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv06486
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE SANTORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOUGLAS et al v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06488
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DOUGLAS and MELISSA DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ADAMS v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06493
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCOLLAM v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv10902
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHAWNA MCCOLLAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURKE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv06469
Plaintiff:
TONYA BURKE
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.