District of Delaware Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 11 - 20 of 2,339
Desmond v. Phelps et al
as 1:2015cv00327
Plaintiff: Christopher R. Desmond
Defendant: Perry Phelps, David Pierce
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Young et al v. Phelps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff: Idris Young, Ernest Parson, Michael Manley and others
Defendant: Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardwick v. Phelps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00326
Plaintiff: James Hardwick
Defendant: Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Zecca v. Wesley
as 1:2015cv00317
Plaintiff: Rocco John Zecca
Defendant: Steven Wesley
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00305
Petitioner: Jermaine L. Carter
Respondent: David Pierce, Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Warden, JTVCC
as 1:2015cv00303
Petitioner: Monir George
Respondent: Warden, JTVCC
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guilfoil v. Deloy et al
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff: Dale A. Guilfoil
Defendant: Michael Deloy, Perry Phelps, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bible v. State of Delaware
as 1:2015cv00285
Petitioner: Donald E. Bible
Respondent: State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Evans v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00270
Petitioner: Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Respondent: David Pierce, Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pinkston v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Petitioner: Jesus L. Pinkston
Respondent: David Pierce, Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.