District of New Jersey Intellectual Property Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 5,107
NITTO DENKO CORPORATION v. HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
as 2:2016cv03595
Plaintiff: NITTO DENKO CORPORATION
Defendant: HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. TRUSTWAVE HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2016cv03573
Plaintiff: STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant: TRUSTWAVE HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CENTRIFY CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv03574
Plaintiff: STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant: CENTRIFY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
STEINMETZ v. SCHOLASTIC, INCORPORATED
as 2:2016cv03583
Plaintiff: GEORGE STEINMETZ
Defendant: SCHOLASTIC, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement
BEAUTY PLUS TRADING CO. v. AVIANCE HAIR CORP.
as 2:2016cv03532
Plaintiff: BEAUTY PLUS TRADING CO.
Defendant: AVIANCE HAIR CORP.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION et al v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC.
as 3:2016cv03642
Plaintiff: UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION , SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant: ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
TELEBRANDS CORP. v. RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv03474
Plaintiff: TELEBRANDS CORP.
Defendant: RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION , TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
v. RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv03473
Defendant: RAGNER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Declaratory Judgment
POOL & SPA ENCLOSURES, LLC v. AQUA SHIELD, INC.
as 3:2016cv03418
Plaintiff: POOL & SPA ENCLOSURES, LLC
Defendant: AQUA SHIELD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
EBLE v. AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC.
as 1:2016cv03365
Plaintiff: ROBIN P. EBLE
Defendant: AMERICAN NEIGHBORHOOD MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY, LLC.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?