District of New Jersey Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed


Cases 21 - 30 of 426
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ASSORTED JEWELRY VALUED AT APPROXIMATELY $52,345.00 et al
as 3:2015cv07782
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ASSORTED JEWELRY VALUED AT APPROXIMATELY $52,345.00, $95,505.39 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN TD BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 4783113255 HELD IN THE NAME OF ROMAN SHNAYDERMAN AND LEYLA SHNAYDERMAN
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $120,084.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2015cv07727
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $120,084.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $384,980 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv06553
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $384,980 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $1,879,991.64 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN SBERBANK OF RUSSIA'S INTERBANK OR CORRESPONDENT BANK ACCOUNT NUMBERS 0004403077 AND 0004169401, HELD AT DEUSTCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv06442
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $1,879,991.64 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN SBERBANK OF RUSSIA'S INTERBANK OR CORRESPONDENT BANK ACCOUNT NUMBERS 0004403077 AND 0004169401, HELD AT DEUSTCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
Claimant: Sberbank of Russia
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN 28 NETSPEND PREPAID DEBIT CARDS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY $89,175.66, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT A We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv06346
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN 28 NETSPEND PREPAID DEBIT CARDS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY $89,175.66, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT A
Cause Of Action: USA Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE 2011 WHITE BMW 535xi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv06127
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ONE 2011 WHITE BMW 535xi
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE FULL MOUNT TAXIDERMIED FEMALE TIGER
as 2:2015cv04851
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ONE FULL MOUNT TAXIDERMIED FEMALE TIGER
Cause Of Action: Endangered Species Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A TOTAL OF $3,397,230.97 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 2:2015cv03952
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: A TOTAL OF $3,397,230.97 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY , $417,866.75 SEIZED FROM VALLEY NATIONAL BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER 41651901, HELD IN THE NAME OF EXCELL BRANDS, $305,070.41 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER 381031654225, HELD IN THE NAME OF EXCELL BRANDS and others
Claimant: LYNETTE ROSENBLUM, BERNARD ROSENBLUM, A. ROSENBLUM INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $202,043.68 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN A FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0594
as 3:2015cv03522
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $202,043.68 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN A FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0594
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE 2014 BLACK PORSCHE CAYMAN COUPE BEARING VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (VIN) WP0AB2A85EK191487 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02036
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ONE 2014 BLACK PORSCHE CAYMAN COUPE BEARING VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (VIN) WP0AB2A85EK191487, THE REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS DENTON DRIVE, DALLAS, TEXAS, A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY $5,453,011.81 COMPRISED OF and others
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?