US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 6 of 6
NGUYEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv06905
Plaintiff:
SON NGUYEN and THUY NGUYEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: ALFRED L. WOLFF, INC., PO 660 (LOT#1014), CHICAGO, IL 60601, WHITE HONEY, PRODUCT OF CHINA, GROSS 311.5 KG/NET 290 KG, FCL #OO
as 2:2010cv04461
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: ALFRED L. WOLFF, INC., PO 660 (LOT#1014), CHICAGO, IL 60601, WHITE HONEY, PRODUCT OF CHINA, GROSS 311.5 KG/NET 290 KG, FCL #OO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: (DRUM) CHINESE BEE'S HONEY, NW 290KGS, GW311.5KGS, PRODUCTS OF CHINA, BATCH NO. 16691
as 2:2010cv02618
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
64 DRUMS, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: (DRUM) CHINESE BEE'S HONEY, NW 290KGS, GW311.5KGS, PRODUCTS OF CHINA, BATCH NO. 16691
Movant:
ALFRED L. WOLFF, INC.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FOUR 25 KG. DRUMS OF HOODIA GORDONII DRY EXTRACT IMPORTED FROM FRANCE
as 2:2009cv02582
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
FOUR 25 KG. DRUMS OF HOODIA GORDONII DRY EXTRACT IMPORTED FROM FRANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 23/50 POUND PAPER BAGS, MORE OR LESS, OF CHOCOLATE FUDGE POWDER, AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART: "VAN LEER CHOCOLATE FLAVORED FUDGE POWDER ITEM #2124 NET WT. 50 LBS. VAN LEER CHOCOLATE et al
as 2:2004cv05524
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 033
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
