Middle District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 10,985
Lockett v. Tuttle
as 3:2015cv01018
Petitioner: Tramale Lockett
Respondent: John Tuttle, PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricks v. Thomas et al
as 4:2015cv01017
Petitioner: Gregory L. Ricks
Respondent: John Thomas, PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv01013
Plaintiff: Jeremy Smith
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Jr., United States Penitentiary Lewisburg and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Albright v. Gadahn, et al
as 1:2015cv01012
Petitioner: Wayne R. Albright
Respondent: Adam Gadahn, L. Dennis Kozlowski, John Demjanjuk and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Husband v. Ebbert
as 3:2015cv00995
Petitioner: Eunice Husband
Respondent: David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castro v. Bowser
as 3:2015cv00987
Plaintiff: Albert Castro
Defendant: Jennifer Bowser
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor v. McCullough et al
as 3:2015cv00988
Plaintiff: Anthony E Proctor
Defendant: McCullough, S. Ellenberger, The Five Program Review Committee Members and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Luzerne County Correctional Facility
as 3:2015cv00989
Plaintiff: John Simpson
Defendant: Luzerne County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McCausin v. Eckard et al
as 3:2015cv00982
Petitioner: Donald J. McCausin
Respondent: J. Eckard, PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Doe et al
as 3:2015cv00986
Plaintiff: Shawn Manning
Defendant: John/Jane Doe, LCCF Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.