US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,727
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Minor
as 3:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Petitioner:
Chanelle Britt
Defendant:
Tukishia Minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, Local 262 v. Bloomsburg Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
as 4:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, Local 262
Defendant:
Bloomsburg Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
K-Fab, Inc. et al v. Roscommon Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
K-Fab, Inc.
Defendant:
Roscommon Insurance Company, Roscommon Member Plan Master Trust, Stone Mountain Risk, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Kyle v. Unique Home Care Services, LLC
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Kyle
Defendant:
Unique Home Care Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Toole v. Interim Home Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
William Toole
Defendant:
Interim Home Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Moreno v. Cardinal Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Joe Moreno
Defendant:
Cardinal Systems, Inc. and Fox Pools of York, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Weinstock v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Inez Weinstock
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Su et al v. Jonestown Rd Chicken LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Jonestown Rd Chicken LLC and Tom Rudzenski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hill v. Hershey Creamery Company
as 1:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hill
Defendant:
Hershey Creamery Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mandarano v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Angel Mandarano
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
