District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 35,318
JOHNSON v. WARDEN SCI HUNTINGDON et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Petitioner: CHARLES JOHNSON
Respondent: WARDEN SCI HUNTINGDON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. DISANTIS
as 1:2017cv00052
Plaintiff: CHARLES JOHNSON
Defendant: ERNEST J. DISANTIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SCI HUNTINGDON
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff: CHARLES JOHNSON
Defendant: SCI HUNTINGDON
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz-Latorre v. Delbaso et al
as 3:2017cv00316
Petitioner: Miguel Ruiz-Latorre
Respondent: Theresa Delbaso, Attorney General Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, District Attorney Dauphin County
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOYE v. SCI CAMPHILL PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv00219
Plaintiff: NATHAN HOYE
Defendant: SCI CAMPHILL PRISON, SCI HUNTNDON PRISON MEDICAL STAFF, BOAL
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv00224
Petitioner: AUGUSTUS SIMMONS
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazel v. Perdue
as 1:2017cv00297
Petitioner: William Hazel
Respondent: Russell Perdue
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. PARISH et al
as 2:2017cv00791
Plaintiff: PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant: PARISH, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
DEBERRY v. COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv00795
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL DEBERRY
Defendant: COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL S. KEEN, SCOTT M. GOLDY and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
v. PETRUSKY et al
as 2:2017cv00763
Defendant: DANIEL PETRUSKY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?