Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,773
CURTIS v. COMHAR, INC.
as 2:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
BRITTNEY CURTIS
Defendant:
COMHAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
PERRY v. L&J TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
DORYAL PERRY
Defendant:
L&J TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES, INC.
Thompson v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS PLATE LLC
as 2:2024cv01528
Plaintiff:
Carelton M. Thompson
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS PLATE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Account Receivable
TRUSCELLO v. BGC 135 9TH STREET, INC. d/b/a RICKS CABARET, et al
as 2:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
SHAYNA TRUSCELLO
Defendant:
BGC 135 9TH STREET, INC. d/b/a RICKS CABARET, and PAUL COLLELA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
LAGARD v. APPALACHIAN FIELD SERVICE, LLC
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAGARD
Defendant:
APPALACHIAN FIELD SERVICE, LLC
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' MEDICAL PLAN v. BARTHOLOMEW et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' MEDICAL PLAN
Defendant:
JUSTIN BARTHOLOMEW and CASEY BARTHOLOMEW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rodriguez v. Autozoners, LLC
as 2:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Iliana Bernabe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
TANCREDI v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01469
Plaintiff:
BARBARA TANCREDI
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STEAHLE v. CARGROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
as 2:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
MEGAN STEAHLE
Defendant:
CARGROUP HOLDINGS, LLC
Schaefer v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Barbara Schaefer
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
