District of Pennsylvania Court Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 343,380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01933
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
ADAMOUSKY et al v. KENNEDY, P.C. et al
as 5:2016cv05087
Plaintiff: ALLISON ADAMOUSKY , LORIANN WALTERS
Defendant: KENNEDY, P.C., ROBERT A. EVARTS
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Dennison v. USA
as 1:2016cv01937
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Daryl Douglas Dennison
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MYERS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2016cv05083
Plaintiff: DANIEL D. MYERS
Defendant: MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, KAREN NYCE, KIMBERLY A. BERKELY and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01935
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith & Morris Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01938
Appellant: Smith & Morris Holdings LLC , Michael C Morris
Trustee: United States Trustee , Mark J Conway
Cause Of Action: Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MCPHAIL v. HARDY, et al
as 1:2016cv00233
Plaintiff: ERIC J. MCPHAIL
Defendant: DAVID HARDY, THOMAS D. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
DELBRIDGE v. LARA et al
as 2:2016cv01455
Plaintiff: MICHAEL D. DELBRIDGE
Defendant: FRANK LARA, DALLAS B. JONES, OSCAR MACH and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01456
Petitioner: KEVIN LEE MURPHY
Respondent: JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?