U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 3,562
Tony Forrester v. Officer Kemp
as 24-1276
Plaintiff:
TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant:
OFFICER KEMP, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and ANDREA MITCHELL
Anita Washington v. Michael Coward
as 24-1274
Plaintiff:
ANITA WASHINGTON and M.W.
Defendant:
MICHAEL COWARD, ELIZEBETH HEATH, LYNN NETHKIN and others
Dan Chacko v. Melissa Preston
as 24-1243
Plaintiff:
DAN CHACKO
Defendant:
MELISSA PRESTON, DAVID POWELL, JOHN R. FORD and others
Elizabeth Roberts v. John Does 1 to 2
as 24-1241
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2 and CITY OF HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND, A Municipal Corporation
Randall Williams v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estates of Shanice R. Dantzler-Williams and Miranda R. Dantzler-Williams and BETTY SIMMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephanie Dantzler
Defendant:
EMILY PELLETIER, CLINTON SACKS, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Justyna Jensen v. Maryland Cannabis Administration
as 24-1216
Plaintiff:
JUSTYNA JENSEN
Defendant:
MARYLAND CANNABIS ADMINISTRATION and WILLIAM TILBURG
Patsy Talley v. Dale Folwell
as 24-1215
Plaintiff:
PATSY TALLEY
Defendant:
DALE R. FOLWELL, individually and in his official capacity as Treasurer of the State of North Carolina, LENTZ BREWER, individually and in their official capacity, JOHN EBBIGHAUSEN, individually and in their official capacity and others
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
