Fourth Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,121
Mission Integrated Technologies, LLC v. Joshua Clemente
as 24-1932
Defendant:
TIMOTHY G. CLEMENTE and JOSHUA R. CLEMENTE
Plaintiff:
MISSION INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Brooks Sports, Inc. v. PUMA SE
as 3:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Brooks Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
PUMA SE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Non-Infringement - Declaratory Judgment
Nanjing 3H Medical Products Co., LTD. v. KT Health, LLC
as 1:2024cv02745
Defendant:
KT HEALTH, LLC
Plaintiff:
NANJING 3H MEDICAL PRODUCTS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 256 Patent Non-Infringement (Correction of Named Inventor)
Sandstrom v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01681
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Sandstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sandstrom v. Ericsson Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Mark Sandstrom
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01675
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Linfo IP, LLC v. Fast Growing Trees, LLC
as 0:2024cv05108
Defendant:
Fast Growing Trees, LLC doing business as Fast Growing Trees.com
Plaintiff:
Linfo IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Airspace Systems, Inc. v. Dedrone Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01625
Defendant:
Dedrone Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Airspace Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00085
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Maximus Inc.
as 1:2024cv01598
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Maximus Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
