District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,491
Fountain v. Graham et al
as 8:2017cv02665
Petitioner: Domonique DE Fountain
Respondent: Warden Richard J Graham, Jr., The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2017cv02499
Petitioner: Corey M. Reed
Defendant: Ricky Foxwell, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barber v. Foxwell
as 8:2017cv02491
Petitioner: Rahymeen Jamal Barber, Sr
Respondent: Rickey Foxwell
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bond v. Warden Oliver
as 8:2017cv02481
Petitioner: David J Bond, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Oliver
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Foxell et al
as 8:2017cv02475
Petitioner: Gregory Donzell Bailey
Respondent: Ricky Foxell, Brian Frosh
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick v. Bishop et al
as 8:2017cv02445
Petitioner: David G. Patrick
Respondent: Frank Bishop, Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurst v. Foxwell et al
as 8:2017cv02411
Petitioner: Paul Martin Hurst
Respondent: Ricky Foxwell, Brian Frosh
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Artis v. Bishop
as 1:2017cv02410
Petitioner: John Earl Artis
Respondent: Frank B. Bishop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chadwick v. Bishop et al
as 1:2017cv02394
Petitioner: Steve C. Chadwick
Respondent: Frank Bishop, Jr., Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. State of Maryland
as 8:2017cv02401
Petitioner: Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?