US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,035
Haynes v. Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated
as 5:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kara Haynes
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Littares v. TCOM, L.P.
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LITTARES
Defendant:
TCOM, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Littares v. TCOM, L.P.
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Littares
Defendant:
TCOM, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davies v. Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davies
Defendant:
KONICA MINOLTA HEALTHCARE AMERICAS, INC.
Velez-Torres v. Standard Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Domingo Velez-Torres
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Velez-Torres v. Standard Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Domingo Velez-Torres
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Battle v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC
as 5:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jewelyn Battle
Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Battle v. Duke Energy Progress, LLC DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-487-D-RJ
as 4:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jewelyn Battle
Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Johnson v PHP of NC, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
PHP of NC, Inc. and Justine Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
