Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 980
WASALAAM v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2016cv01068
Plaintiff: SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant: CHRIST YOUNG, DARYL WILLIAMS, SCOTLAND COUNTY AND CITY OF LAURINBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
POLK v. BOWEN
as 1:2016cv01066
Plaintiff: BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Defendant: DANNY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01064
Plaintiff: ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant: JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., C.C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLELLAND v. LEXINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01062
Plaintiff: JAMES F. MCCLELLAND
Defendant: LEXINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVIDSON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00979
Plaintiff: ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant: JOSEPH GARDNER, CHRISTOPHER C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWDEN v. UNKNOWN EVIDENCE OFFICER et al
as 1:2016cv00956
Plaintiff: KENNY LEE BOWDEN
Defendant: UNKNOWN EVIDENCE OFFICER, KEVIN MAUNEY, CLARENCE BRADLEY WRIGHT, JR.
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. WOODS et al
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff: JEREMY MARTIN
Defendant: ADAM LAMONT WOODS, CHRISTOPHER E. LYNCH, PERSON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
POLK v. ALBEMARLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2016cv00935
Plaintiff: BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Defendant: ALBEMARLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNINGS V. BRATHWAITH
as 1:2016cv00926
Plaintiff: BRYANT DENNINGS
Defendant: STEPHENIE R. BRATHWAITH
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
FARROW v. USDC MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2016cv00912
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANTHONY FARROW
Defendant: USDC MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?