North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,516
Kindstrand v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Audrey Kindstrand
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Barnes v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Simona Seaberry Barnes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jacobs v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Terry Jacobs
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Simmons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Felicia Marie Simmons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Klyman v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Karen Klyman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Xavier Bacerra and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marler v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Susan Marler
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CLARK v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
SHINEKA CLARK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Autry v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brian Autry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
TRUITT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
GEORGE TRUITT
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.