North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 30,318
Rhinehardt v. Moore et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tyree Rhinehardt
Defendant:
D. F. Moore, AJ Osmer and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02077
Petitioner:
Wayne Porter
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03081
Plaintiff:
Colell B. Steele and Colell Barion Steele
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womble v. Smith et al
as 5:2024ct03078
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamont Womble
Defendant:
Domenick Smith, Lt. Renita Summers, John R. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capps v. Hunter et al
as 5:2024ct03079
Plaintiff:
Edward Rummus Capps, III
Defendant:
Sargent T. Hunter, Sargent Farrow and Warden Steven Wadell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guin v. North Carolina Adult Corrections
as 5:2024hc02076
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guin, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Carroll et al
as 5:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Cedric Caldwell
Defendant:
FNU Carroll, FNU Adkins and FNU Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Cruz Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Ka Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
